An interesting post at Washington Monthly draws attention to today's ruling by the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals on the definition of "any" when considering whether a company has to install pollution control equipment. In today's environment of no boundaries for double-speak by the executive branch (E.g. "torture," "success" in Iraq, "enemy combatant," warrantless searches of American citizens is "legal"), I'll welcome such small measure of pushback.

UPDATE: Pitt's JURIST has this report.
- posted by C @ 11:38:00 PM